ABRUPT EARTH CHANGES

3 responses to “Correlation between the orbital positions of Pluto/ Neptune and solar activity in the past 8650 years”

1. 

   Jan

   20. June 2021

   What you assume is, that our anchient watched star positions in order to know about complex mechanisms like sunspots and related weather phenomina? If the spots change with planet positions, watching planets could indicate spot activity. Until now our specialists are highly convinced that you need something as complex as Stonehenge to find the right date to seed and hunt.

   If the megalithic remains try to teach us about larger circles, they are very unsuccessful. If they are built for a purpose in their time we are not able to fgure out. So we have to follow every idea. Thanks for that!

   LikeLike

2. 

   JA7TDO

   20. June 2021

   Saturn, Jupiter, Neptune, and Uranus are the stars that were once the Sun. Even today, some of the interstellar medium that enters the solar system is distributed to these past suns. The interstellar medium that is distributed changes depending on the position of each planet. The sunspot cycle is a typical example.

   LikeLike

3. 

   www-BillHowell-ca

   15. June 2021

   This is fantastic! I don’t remember seeing a Pluto-inclusive solar activity model (other than models that included all planets), albeit my memory is bad and getting worse with age. Angles with respect to the ecliptic I also don’t remember in this context, and few bother to back so far in time. Right or wrong isn’t important – you thought about it (< 1 in 10k scientists ever do), did work, and let the data do the talking. Rare. As usual, you have gone [further, better] than essentially all of the "experts".

   I've long thought that [physicist, astronomer]s have long been playing with 2 cut a deck of 52 when looking at potential planetary-induced solar tides etc as "proofs" that the planets cannot affect the Sun. That's even before noticing the complete absence of electro-magnetics eg [electric, plasma] universe concepts which actually work when gravity fails at all scales of astronomy). I do like Paul Charbonneau's paper on the perpetual resurgence of planetary-influence concepts. Every 7-20 years or so it seems that someone notices this :
   Paul Charbonneau 2002 "The rise and fall of the first sunspot model" JHA xxxiii Science History Publications Ltd. – Provided by the NASA Astrophysics data system (I have a copy, but not a lifor it – search)
   But I take Charbonneau's paper as the conventional gravity view, worth considering but not an answer, and certainly not a proof except for the myopic model it considers.

   I won't have time to get into the details beyond my quick scrutiny of your Figures 3 & 4. Maybe if I get back to old projects some day… I wonder if Ben Davidson's profiling of Milky Way current sheets, analogous to Solar system current sheets, might also be worth considering?

   LikeLiked by 2 people