Remember “Chemtrails” Conspiracy Theories? Geo- engineering? Globalist elites and UN-friendly institutions have been announcing for several years that they will start spraying aerosols into the upper atmosphere with aircrafts any time soon now (next year, next month, etc.). At the same time, the same people also insist that anyone who claims they are spraying aerosols into the upper atmosphere with aircrafts, is a tinfoil hat- wearing lunatic. Now, it is Bill Gates himself who gets in the game of altering the atmosphere to save us from “dangerous sunlight.” and thus “Man-made Global Warming”. It may also bee that they are trying to break up entering cosmic rays which are much more abundant in a Solar Minimum, plus the aerosols block out UV-C radiation and higher electron flux.
It has been argued on this website that everything you see happening on the world stage these days is related to the abrupt changes in Solar- and Geomagnetic Activity, trending to a Grand Solar Minimum in the next decade, including climate disruption, long term cooling as well as increased human peacefulness and rationality.
The same elites and institutions who want to keep humanity under house arrest indefinitely, now also want people to get less sunlight even when they do get outside. A recent study has shown “Vitamin D Insufficiency May Account for Almost Nine of Ten COVID-19 Deaths”.
And by locked down indefinitely, I mean only ten years, of course. “UK Supreme Court Judge Expects People Will Be Forced To Wear Masks, Stay Home For Ten Years.”
The question remains: If they have all the infrastructure and planning set up and keep announcing that they will start spraying the atmosphere next year, or soon; why do they keep delaying it without explanation? Since a large part of the population cannot handle reality, it would be effective for governments and advisors to wait for actual climate disruption and cooling to start and then try and take the blame for it, to keep the masses calm and under control. The article below even warns too much geo- engineering could cause a Maunder Minimum ice age.
Here some speculation from my article Climate Change Explained, the 3rd Narrative:
“In the fictional film Snowpiercer (2013), the main plot is based on antropogenic global warming; world governments started to spray chemicals into the air to prevent global warming and it worked a little too well and it caused the Earth to freeze over. A similar scenario is imagined in the film (Geo Storm 2017). Governments and other opinion shapers seem to be keen on making more people to become interested in conspiracy theories. If an episode of climate collapse as in the 14th century should happen again, it must be either greenhouse gasses, or for those who didn’t believe the global warming narrative: It must be climate engineering under the pretext of trying to fix anthropogenic climate change. If humans caused it, humans can fix it.”
“This chimes in with the following article: „Are we playing God with Earth? “Scientist admits he is ‘terrified’ of the technology being developed to stop global warming.“
On Tuesday, the Times reported: “A large balloon will be released in Sweden this summer near the Arctic town of Kiruna. As it climbs to an altitude of 12 miles it will cross a historic threshold: the first serious attempt to explore whether global warming could be kept in check by dimming the sun. The balloon will drop particles of calcium carbonate — chalk dust, essentially — to see if releasing them into the stratosphere could eventually deflect a portion of the sun’s energy and lower temperatures on Earth.”
A Bill Gates Venture Aims To Spray Dust Into The Atmosphere To Block The Sun. What Could Go Wrong?
Microsoft’s MSFT -1.3% billionaire founder Bill Gates is financially backing the development of sun-dimming technology that would potentially reflect sunlight out of Earth’s atmosphere, triggering a global cooling effect. The Stratospheric Controlled Perturbation Experiment (SCoPEx), launched by Harvard University scientists, aims to examine this solution by spraying non-toxic calcium carbonate (CaCO3) dust into the atmosphere — a sun-reflecting aerosol that may offset the effects of global warming.
Widespread research into the efficacy of solar geoengineering has been stalled for years due to controversy. Opponents believe such science comes with unpredictable risks, including extreme shifts in weather patterns not dissimilar to warming trends we are already witnessing. Environmentalists similarly fear that a dramatic shift in mitigation strategy will be treated as a green light to continue emitting greenhouse gases with little to no changes in current consumption and production patterns.
SCoPEx will take a small step in its early research this June near the town of Kiruna, Sweden, where the Swedish Space Corporation has agreed to help launch a balloon carrying scientific equipment 12 miles (20 km) high. The launch will not release any stratospheric aerosols. Rather, it will serve as a test to maneuver the balloon and examine communications and operational systems. If successful, this could be a step towards a second experimental stage that would release a small amount of CaCO3 dust into the atmosphere.
PROMOTEDhttps://426ee6be47ade2ada151f2941209e121.safeframe.googlesyndication.com/safeframe/1-0-38/html/container.htmlhttps://426ee6be47ade2ada151f2941209e121.safeframe.googlesyndication.com/safeframe/1-0-38/html/container.htmlMitsubishi Heavy Industries BRANDVOICE | Paid ProgramOil & Gas Outlook – Embracing Change From Now To 2040
David Keith, a professor of applied physics and public policy at Harvard University, recognizes the “very many real concerns” of geoengineering. It is true that no one knows what will happen until the CaCO3 is released and then studied afterward. Keith and fellow SCoPEx scientists published a paper in 2017 suggesting that the dust may actually replenish the ozone layer by reacting with ozone-destroying molecules. “Further research on this and similar methods could lead to reductions in risks and improved efficacy of solar geoengineering methods,” write the authors of the paper.
MORE FOR YOUAmerica’s Biggest Owner Of Farmland Is Now Bill GatesLarge Numbers Of Health Care And Frontline Workers Are Refusing Covid-19 VaccineSupreme Court Will Decide Whether Police Can Enter A Home To Seize Guns Without A Warrant
The exact amount of CaCO3 needed to cool the planet is unknown, and SCoPEx scientists similarly cannot confirm whether it is the best stratospheric aerosol for the job. Early research suggests that the substance has “near-ideal optical properties” that would allow it to absorb far less radiation that sulfate aerosols, causing significantly less stratospheric heating. This is the purpose of the experiment: once a safe, experimental amount of CaCO3 is released, the balloon will fly through it, sampling atmospheric reactions and recording resulting dynamics. Frank Keutsch, the project’s principal investigator, does not know what the results might bring. The perfect aerosol would not immediately tamper with stratospheric chemistry at all: “The only thing it would do is scatter maximum sunlight and hence cool down the planet.”
Proponents of geoengineering have cited the global cooling effects of volcanic eruptions that result from the introduction of sulfuric ash into the atmosphere. The 1815 eruption of Mount Tambora in Indonesia resulted in the “year without a summer,” while the 1991 eruption of Mount Pinatubo in the Philippines lowered global average temperatures by 0.5° C. Deliberate introduction of similar particles could potentially counter decades of greenhouse gas emissions. A report by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change suggested the SCoPEx procedure could lower global temperatures by a full 1.5° C for no more than $1-10 billion a year.
Again, these temperature decreases bring with them serious risks. Freezing temperatures in 1815 led to failed crops in near-famine conditions. British scientists have cited stratospheric aerosols from volcanic eruptions in Alaska and Mexico as the potential cause of drought in Africa’s Sahel region. Major disruption of the global climate could bring unintended consequences, negatively impacting highly populated regions and engineering another refugee crisis.
David Keith has proposed the creation of a “risk pool” to compensate smaller nations for collateral damage caused by such tests, but such a payout might be little comfort to those displaced by unlivable conditions. The United States, Brazil, and Saudi Arabia blocked a 2019 United Nations assessment of global geoengineering plans. International cooperation will be required to assess the risks, winners, and losers of any such experiment, and how best to proceed with all in mind.
Considering the unknown risks attached to solar geoengineering, OECD members should continue in their efforts to develop economically attractive renewable energy technology, even as it supplements such efforts with limited and careful research and experimentation.
With assistance from Hayley Arlin and James Grant