Allgemein

How chemical- hormonal Disruption determines Elections

From Hormonageddon Chapter 1:

Gonad hormones (sex hormones) literally determine political elections. In the 2012 presidential election season (Obama/ Biden’s reelection against Mitt Romney) weakly affiliated Democrats had 19% higher basal testosterone than those who identified strongly with the party. When weakly affiliated Democrats received additional testosterone, the strength of their party fell by 12% (p=.01) and they reported 45% warmer feelings towards Republican candidates for president.  “Testosterone induces a “red shift” among weakly-affiliated Democrats,” summarized the paper. [i]

Leaving out the artificial testosterone treatment: If a 19% lower basal testosterone level can make a strongly affiliated Democrat as opposed to a weakly affiliated Democrat, then what would this mean for testosterone levels of men 50 years ago, when they were twice as high as today?

By the trajectory the democratic party has shifted to the left in recent years, it is easy to extrapolate, that if people as a whole would not have their gonad hormones artificially compromised, i.e. if man had the testosterone of their grandfathers (twice their current levels,; and if women had the oestrogen levels of their grandmothers)), then no one would vote for the current democrat platform. Biden could have received but a few percentages of the votes. Again, people and peoples don’t just “evolve” without an interference to biology or natural selection and times don’t just “change”.


[i] Zak, Paul. Testosterone Administration Induces A Red Shift in Democrats. Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor], 2021-11-24. https://doi.org/10.3886/E155441V1 https://www.openicpsr.org/openicpsr/project/155441/version/V1/view

Categories: Allgemein

4 replies »

  1. Any ideas that vaccinated people have different levels of hormones? Any differences between the USA and other countries?

    Like

  2. “if man had the testosterone of their grandfathers (twice their current levels), then no one would vote for the current democrat platform.”
    This includes:
    if women had the Estrogen levels of their grandmothers, then no one would vote for the current democrat platform.

    Like

  3. “if man had the testosterone of their grandfathers (twice their current levels), then no one would vote for the current democrat platform.”

    I think women have been voting in US presidential elections since 1920. What a peculiar bit of text.

    Like

  4. I assume that the researchers were careful enough to address the rising dominance of the female vote? But I as that is also quite variable?

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s