Eight years before the Covid vaccine, the World’s largest Re-Insurance company predicted “unforeseen consequences of nanotechnology” as one of the highest insurance risks in a 4 to 10- year timeframe.
By Sacha Dobler Feb 18. 2020
Introduction
Almost all global political and economic leaders are dead set to vaccinate the entire world population with Covid vaccines which are still experimental as of early 2022.
The nanoparticles which are being marketed as essential ingredients of the Covid vaccines are lipid nanoparticles, further, ferritin nano- vaccines will be released shortly. [1] The lipid nanoparticles are used as a medium to deliver the mRNA into the cells.
Independent researchers also announced to have detected graphene and graphene oxide nanoparticles in the currently administered doses, graphene oxide is also an official compound of many types of masks, mandatory in many countries.
At the same time, 2021 saw an exorbitant increase in heart inflammation as reported by the CDC- VEARS data base as vaccine side effects (up to 240 times more myocarditis in 2021 than in any other year; from an average of 100 cases reported per year to 24,211 cases in 2021).
The problem has become prominent enough that even science magazine reported:
“Suspicions grow that nanoparticles in Pfizer’s COVID-19 vaccine trigger rare allergic reactions.” [2]
In Feb 2022 the CDC confirms an increased risk of heart inflammation after Covid Vaccines.
As it happens, for a decade, the global insurance industry had been preoccupied with the long-term consequences of nanoparticles. From Hormonageddon, 2021, p: 22 (free eBook here):
“The world’s largest reinsurance company, Swiss RE declared in their 2013 Emerging risk insights” SONAR report that out of the 6 highest insurance risk topics, 3 are casualty-related topics and were assessed as having the highest impact within 4 -10 years (so roughly from 2017 to 2023). These are: “endocrine disrupting chemicals “, “unforeseen consequences of electromagnetic fields” and “unforeseen consequences of nanotechnology “.
The former two problems are connected in this book. They not only keep insurance moguls up at night, be it for different reasons. “
Out of the 27 categories of emerging insurance risks featured in the report, 11 were directly related to health and healthcare.
The book Hormonageddon elucidates how endocrine disrupting chemicals and electromagnetic fields (primarily from wireless technology) are disrupting gonadal (sex) hormones and thus contribute not only to infertility, but also to passivity, depression, passive aggression, lack of initiative and thus the disintegration of societies. The role of nanotechnology had not been included at the time of publication.
As it turns out, the third most important topic for the reinsurance industry in this 4 -10-year timeframe (till 2023) – nanotechnology – is directly connected to the Covid pandemic and authoritarian vaccine mandates. Further, the nanoparticles in the injections themselves can deteriorate gonad cells and perpetuate the hormonal and behavioural downward spiral (see below). Even before the vaccines, it was found that men with low testosterone levels were much more severely affected by Covid infections. [3]
As a side note, the report also listed [for risks with a 1-3 year time frame], “The topics “prolonged power blackout“, “run-away inflation and surging bond yields“ and “big data“ were assessed as being of highest concern as they could have a high impact on the entire insurance industry and might occur within a short period of time.”

Further, as risks with a medium overall impact in a time frame of 1-3 years were listed:
-Changing lifestyles
-Emerging infectious diseases
As risks with a medium overall impact in a time frame of 4-10 years were listed:
-Drug resistance
-The future of medicine
From the category Life & Health in the SONAR report:
“Healthcare costs are becoming unsustainable, due largely to a chronic disease epidemic fuelled by unhealthy lifestyles and ageing populations. Increasingly, early death is less of an economic concern than decades spent alive and sick. “

Fig. 2 This Swiss Re SONAR report of 2013 features 27 emerging risk topics which could impact the insurance industry in the future. Topics were mainly derived from Swiss Re‘s internal SONAR process and have been assessed by Swiss Re‘s emerging risk management experts.
Already in 2007, the German insurance company ADAC changed their policies for accident insurance to exclude mass vaccine damage: “Insurance does not pay compensation in cases of vaccination injuries as a consequence of mandatory mass vaccination.”
Unforeseen consequences of nanotechnology by 2021
First, let’s look at the different types of nanomaterials that are officially contained in the Covid vaccines and advertised as such:
Lipid nanoparticles
cas.org describes the application of nanotechnology in COVID-19 vaccines:
Lipid nanoparticles are a vital component of the Pfizer/BioNTech and Moderna mRNA COVID-19 vaccines, playing a key role in protecting and transporting the mRNA effectively to the right place in cells.
C&EM reported:
Without these lipid shells, there would be no mRNA vaccines for COVID-19.
Fragile mRNA molecules used in COVID-19 vaccines can’t get into cells on their own. They owe their success to lipid nanoparticles that took decades to refine
However, there are several institutions, chemists and physicians who also published evidence of the presence of graphene oxide and reduced graphene oxide in the vaccines (see below).
Side Effects of lipid nanoparticles:
In 2021, researchers found: “Lipid nanoparticles (as in the Covid mRNA vaccines) might also diffuse from the periphery and reach any organs in the body, including CNS (hypothalamus) where they could directly induce side effects.” [4]
The hypothalamus is instrumental in gonad hormone regulation and production. Thus, it is also vital for fertility and human behaviour (see below).
Dr. Wodarg is a former leading epidemiologist for the German Government. He warns of the current use of the Covid vaccines and their horrific side effects, and explains what the nanoparticles can do in the body.
Dr. Wodarg made this appeal to the vaccinated: „Do not take another injection at any rate!“
Video from 21. NOVEMBER 2021: https://auf1.eu/w/kctaRk41eUmTuSpNK1WJuu

In an interview with AUF TV, Dr. Wodarg explains (Translation AbruptEarthChanges):
“Years ago it was protocol to first aspirate an injection for a vaccine (e.i. to draw the piston of the syringe back slightly after inserting the needle) and to make sure that no blood comes out and that no vein was hit before an injection. Since a few years, this is not done anymore for vaccines and especially for the Covid vaccine.” [The German authorities, STIKO, made provisions to stop using Aspiration as a technique in vaccinations in 2017].
“I think it is irresponsible to inject these compounds contained in the vaccine – the nanoparticles with the mRNA – into a vein without aspiration first (to check whether blood is drawn). Because, if these compounds go into the vein, then it can be explained how these nanoparticles in the mRNA go via the veinous blood into the right heart atrium. That’s where the sinoatrial node is, the natural pacemaker. And when the nanoparticles go into the cells inside the heart, it can lead to inflammation and damage, an immunological process can be triggered, spike proteins are generated there, the immune system comes and destroys these cells, and the heart’s conduction system can be altered within a short time, and then you have heart rhythm irregularities and you fall off a bicycle dead. Or soccer players collapse on the field. It especially affects young men, they have strong upper arm muscles. The stronger the muscle, the greater the chance that this goes into the vein. That means it doesn’t happen to everyone, but if the injection is not aspirated, then it is possible that in every case where the vaccine went straight into a vein, it can result in death, it is a very dangerous procedure. If it does not go into the vein, then it is distributed throughout the body via the lymph system and the tissue fluids, and here also, we know from animal studies that these nano particles are accumulating in the liver and the spleen and in the gonads, that means in the ovaries and the testicles, which leads to inflammation and possible infertility.”
Myocarditis and mortality
In a Reuters article, Dr. Anthony Hinton (‘Consultant Surgeon with 30 years of experience in the NHS’) points out that myocarditis has a 20% fatality rate after 2 years and a 50% fatality rate after 5 years.’ Dr. Hinton poignantly explains that ‘you can’t have ‘mild myocarditis’ – in the same way you can’t be ‘a little bit pregnant.’’ [5]
Keep in mind, this is concerning the usual causes of myocarditis. For cases caused by nanoparticles – which can produce mechanical cell damage without being consumed in a reaction like chemically interactive toxins – only time will tell.
Dr. Ramya Dwivedi, Ph.D. comments on lipid nanoparticles:
“In the Pfizer/BioNTech and Moderna vaccines’ human trials, it is reported that side effects often linked to inflammation, such as pain, swelling, fever, and sleepiness, are common.”
“In a recent bioRxiv preprint research paper, Botond Z. Igyártó and colleagues from Thomas Jefferson University demonstrated the inflammatory nature of the lipid nanoparticles (LNPs) in the Pfizer/BioNTech and Moderna vaccines. Upon intradermal administration in mice, they observed massive neutrophil infiltration, activation of diverse inflammatory pathways, and production of various inflammatory cytokines and chemokines. They observed similar observations when the LNPs were delivered intranasally.”
Notably, intranasal inoculation with the same dose (10 μg) of LNP (as in the intradermal delivery) caused a high mortality rate in mice – about 80% of the treated mice died in less than 24 hours. The researchers found that the LNPs’ inflammatory properties are not site-specific. They observed a fast diffusion, dispersion, and distribution rate in the tissues upon internal delivery.
“Thus, the inflammatory milieu induced by the LNPs could be partially responsible for reported side effects of mRNA-LNP-based SARS-CoV-2 vaccines in humans.”
“LNPs might also diffuse from the periphery and reach any organs in the body, including CNS (hypothalamus) where they could directly induce side effects.” [6]
Internasal Covid vaccines are being tested and released soon, the ingredients of the currently used test swabs are not made public.
In a 2022 autopsy of two adolescents who died after the second dose of the vaccine, the cause of myocarditis was attributed to catecholamine-induced injury.
Catecholamines are stress hormones. Dopamine, adrenaline, and noradrenaline are all catecholamines.
“The myocardial injury seen in these post-vaccine hearts is different from typical myocarditis and has an appearance most closely resembling a catecholamine-mediated stress (toxic) cardiomyopathy. Understanding that these instances are different from typical myocarditis and that cytokine storm has a known feedback loop with catecholamines may help guide screening and therapy.” [7]
Other nanoparticles in Covid vaccines
On Dez. 21. 2021, The US Army declared they “Created a single COVID-19 vaccine using a spike ferritin nanoparticle vaccine, against all COVID & SARS variants (even future ones).”
“The Walter Reed’s spike ferritin nanoparticle COVID-19 vaccine, or SpFN, completed animal trials earlier this year with positive results.”
“Very early on, Walter Reed’s infectious diseases branch decided to focus on making a vaccine that would work against not just the existing strain but all of its potential variants as well.”
“Within weeks, Walter Reed researchers expect to announce that human trials show success against Omicron—and even future strains.”
Note ‘all its potential variants’, so vaccines for future variants that don’t even exist yet. [8]
Whether good or bad, all nanotechnology in medicine and the environment is human experimentation at an unprecedented level. All nanoparticles are not created equal. Some are less harmful than others, while some could turn out to be relatively harmless in the long run. But all nanoparticles are radically different from everything that living beings have ever been exposed to in nature. There is no long-term experience, for these particles have only been used for a decade in any meaningful quantity. Nanoparticles are not biodegradable. They don’t react chemically in the body like all other toxins, and they can repeatedly mechanically damage cells and cell components without being neutralized or consumed in a reaction, but they don’t work like enzymes either. On a positive note, as of today, there is some evidence that they slowly disperse from the body over time. (See also proposed remedies below).
There are no health regulations and few methods available to even detect these particles today. The long-term effects can only be “epic”. Non of the responsible bodies have any plan of how to close this Pandora’s Box.
Graphene oxide
– Graphene (/ˈɡræfiːn/) is a nanomaterial, an allotrope of carbon consisting of a single layer of atoms arranged in a two-dimensional honeycomb lattice nanostructure. The name is derived from “graphite” and the suffix -ene, reflecting the fact that the graphite allotrope of carbon contains numerous double bonds.
It’s light, transparent, flexible, incredibly strong, an excellent conductor of heat and electricity and has interesting light absorption abilities. Another of its characteristics is it’s highly integrative with neuron cells in the brain. [9]
As a “wonder material,” graphene is composed of single- layer sheet-like and two-dimensional carbon atoms with sp2 hybridized hexagonal honeycomb structure (Choi and Lee, 2016). Currently, it has been applied in biomedical fields, including drug delivery (Yang et al., 2015),
Several researchers and medical institutions have put forth strong evidence of graphene oxide nanoparticles contained in the Covid vaccines (see below). However, it must be said, not many chemists and medical experts would be in the position to independently deliver the final proof, not least because graphene oxide nanoparticles are almost impossible to be detected optically, as the particles are only one layer of atoms thick. The particles seen in microscopy analyses of Covid- vaccinees do closely resemble those of graphene, but as these can be seen, these are larger conglomerates of nanosized graphene particles. Spectral analysis can only reveal the proportion of atoms and molecules in a sample, which has been shown to overlap significantly with that of graphene oxide, but could theoretically indicate the presence of carbon and oxygen from similar compounds.
The evidence is largely based on larger particles that are optically identical to graphene oxide particles and cannot be explained otherwise in a vaccine.
Evidence for Graphene oxide in Covid Vaccinees
In 2020, a Chinese study (See below) proposed that graphene oxide (GO) should be used in vaccines, citing it does not break down in the body over time as a drawback. “A Chinese patent for a covid vaccination that uses (GO)” also exists: Nano coronavirus recombinant vaccine taking graphene oxide as a carrier, A61K39/12 Viral antigens. Patent CN11222020919A
“By tracking the top 10 graphene applications through the years, one can see how ‘medicine’ rises to become the most popular application of graphene in 2020, ranked by the number of posts written. Beginning with 2015 where medicine was 4th; 2016, 3rd; 2018, 3rd; 2019, 2nd; and finally, 2020,1st on the list. Covid-19 is cited as the obvious reason graphene’s use in medicine was the most popular discussion on the Graphene-info website.” [10]
“Now, according to preliminary results of a study done by the University of Almería in Spain, graphene has been found in the Covid-19 “vaccines”. By examining the contents of a Pfizer / BioNTech vial researchers discovered, there is mRNA, but graphene oxide makes up between 98% and 99% of its contents: ‘this is not a vaccine but a dose of pure graphene oxide into the vein.’ .” [11]
Dr. John’s twitter thread continues with images from Dr. Campra’s report and then concludes with
“There is an urgent need to replicate this analysis! Graphene-family nanomaterials (GFNs), including graphene oxide and reduced graphene oxide, are toxic.”
According to a team of Spanish researchers, La Quinta Columna, symptoms of graphene oxide poisoning include: bilateral pneumonias; thrombogenicity; blood clots; post inflammatory syndrome or systemic / multi-organ inflammations; alteration of the immune system; and, ultimately collapse of the immune system and a cytokine storm.”
“When inhaled, graphene causes inflammation of the mucous membranes and possible loss of taste and smell. Sounds familiar?” [12]
Dr. Robert Young reported that scanning & transmission electron microscopy reveals Graphene oxide in CoV-19 vaccines:
“The observations under optical microscopy revealed and abundance of transparent 2D laminar objects that show great similarity with images from the literature (Xu et al, 2019), and with images obtained from rGO standard (SIGMA) (Figures 1, 2 and 3). “
Images of big transparent sheets of variable size and shapes were obtained, showing corrugated and flat, irregular shapes. Smaller sheets of polygonal shapes, also similar to flakes described in the literature (Xu et al, 2019) can be revealed with pHase Contrast and Dark-Field microscopy (Figure 3).
All these laminar objects were widespread in the aqueous fraction of the blood (Figure 1) or vaccine samples (Figures 2 and 3) and no component described by the registered patent can be associated with these sheets.[13]

Holger Reissner conducted a live microscopic analysis of Covid vaccines on Nuoviso TV. [translation AbruptEarthChanges]:
The lecturer and European Industrial Engineer from the field of Research and Development, Holger Reissner, has made disturbing observations during his studies of hundreds of vaccine doses that are currently being used to combat the Corona pandemic. All of the vaccine doses he and his team examined contained potentially dangerous contaminants, most of which can be seen with a good microscope. To corroborate his data, he shared the findings with various national and international institutions (Comusav, Conuvive, Ärzte für Aufklärung, Anwälte für Aufklärung, die Basis, MWGFD, World Council for Health, Pathologen für Aufklärung, and many more).
He then received the first confirmations from Spain that one of these impurities was graphene. By his analyses he found out that graphene can cause necrosis, fibrosis and thrombosis and thus pose a potentially deadly risk. Also pathologists confirmed his findings and found such particles in the corpses of people who died after the vaccination. Nevertheless, Holger Reissner still hopes to be disproved, since the dissemination of this material administered in this way would have incomprehensible long-term consequences for mankind and especially for children. [14]
Further graphene oxide damage
A study by Cao W. et al 2020 found:
“Graphene oxide (GO aggregates in biological liquid and induces cell death, and it also exhibits poor biosolubility and biocompatibility.
In the future, GO is expected to be introduced into vaccine research to improve the efficacy of vaccines. [15]
“GO affects cell viability and proliferation” [16]
It has been demonstrated that Graphene oxide (GO), causes an increase of intracellular oxidative stress, likely leading to its cytotoxicity and inhibition of cell proliferation. Being one of the main reductive intracellular substances, glutathione (GSH) is vital in the regulation of the oxidative stress level to maintain normal cellular functions.
In this study, we found that GSH could be oxidized to GSSG by GO, leading to the formation of reduced GO (rGO). GSH depletion affects the intracellular reductive/oxidative balance, provoking the increase of the reactive oxygen species level, sequentially inhibiting cell viability and proliferation. Therefore, the reaction between GO and GSH provides a new perspective to explain the origin of GO cytotoxicity. [17]
“Short-term in vivo exposure to graphene oxide can cause damage to the gut and testis.” [18]
“in studies by Jian Zhang et al 2021 on rats, GO or rGO (reduced Graphene oxides) treatment damaged the myocardial tissues and changed the activities of several myocardial enzymes and the lipid peroxidation indicators in the myocardial tissues in mice. “
“rGO was developed from GO following different doses of gamma irradiation. In vitro experiments in H9C2 cells showed that compared with control cells, both GO and rGO treatment inhibited cell viability, promoted cell apoptosis, and elevated the LDH release.
In vivo experiments also revealed that GO or rGO treatment damaged the myocardial tissues and changed the activities of several myocardial enzymes and the lipid peroxidation indicators in the myocardial tissues.
Conclusion: GO exhibited a lower cardiotoxicity than rGO due to the structure difference, and the cardiotoxicity of GO and rGO might be mediated by lipid peroxidation, oxidative stress, and mitochondrial dysfunction. [19]
—
Thought experiment:
An abstract question arises: what if the ambient gamma ray exposure increases by some source, by a gamma ray burst from outer space as happened in Dez 27 2014, – by malfunction of the global wireless antenna system – by a global cyberattack? What if all of humanity is exposed to a threshold level of gamma rays which were otherwise harmless. Now, if many of the vaccinated, if they are carrying an amount of graphene oxide, and this is reduced to rGO, could this lead to an immediate simultaneous increase in myocarditis cases?
—
The Swiss RE sonar report – mentioned at the beginning – says in regards to the risk topic of ‘Unforeseen consequences of nanotechnology’:
“There is some evidence that certain nanostructures may accumulate within tissues and organs and can be absorbed by individual cells. Adverse health effects have been observed in studies of material such as carbon nanotubes, nanoparticles of titanium dioxide, or silica nanoparticles. “
In the same year of the Swiss Re paper, in 2013, the European Union launched two flagship projects: the Human Brain Project (“HBP”); and, the Graphene Flagship (“GF”).
“Funded by the European Commission, the Graphene Flagship aims to secure a major role for Europe in the ongoing technological revolution, helping to bring graphene innovation out of the lab and into commercial applications.”
“Graphene oxide is an important material for a range of applications in biomedicine, energy storage, nanocomposites and others.” [20]
General Nano particles health effects on fertility and sexual behavior
The Effects of Nanomaterials as Endocrine Disruptors
I. Iavicoli et al found that: “Current data support the notion that different types of nanoparticles are capable of altering the normal and physiological activity of the endocrine system.” [21]
Nanoparticles for sterilisation of animals
In 2020, a patent was filed for “A method for non-surgical sterilization of mammals using an antibody-guided nanoparticle carrying cytotoxin to kill gonadal cells exhibiting anti-Mullerian hormone II receptors.” [22] Researchers at Tufts University have devised a novel, fast, and non-surgical means to induce apoptosis in animal gonads for sterilisation. Lipid‐like carriers are used for targeted intracellular delivery of proteins and antibodies that induce cell apoptosis. The procedure is done through single intravenous (IV) injection that does not require anesthesia. Additionally, it is species and sex agnostics.
Applications Animal Sterilization; PCT Publication No. WO 2018-022292 (February 1, 2018)
in 2018, Wang et al determined
Numerous types of NPs are not only able to pass certain biological barriers and exert toxic effects on crucial organs (after inhalation, ingestion, or injection), such as the brain, liver, and kidney, but NPs can also pass through the blood–testis barrier, placental barrier, and epithelial barrier, which protect reproductive tissues, and then accumulate in reproductive organs. NP accumulation damages organs (testis, epididymis, ovary, and uterus) by destroying Sertoli cells, Leydig cells, and germ cells, causing reproductive organ dysfunction that adversely affects sperm quality, quantity, morphology, and motility or reduces the number of mature oocytes and disrupts primary and secondary follicular development. In addition, NPs can disrupt the levels of secreted hormones, causing changes in sexual behavior. “
“Several studies have demonstrated that various NPs can pass through the blood–testis barrier (BTB) and exert their toxic actions on spermatogenesis. Regarding deposition and translocation, the ability of NPs to cross both the blood–brain barrier and the BTB is highly important. “ [23]
The blood–brain barrier can be permeated by graphene nanomaterials.” [24]
Further studies on the effects of Graphene oxide on Gonads conducted by Dziewięcka M. et al 2017:concluded: Short-term in vivo exposure to graphene oxide can cause damage to the gut and testis of A. domesticus.
Administration of GO and GO + Mn2+ with food had an effect on the organism. Many histological changes were found in gut and testis of A. domesticus.
“Short-term exposure to graphene oxide in food causes an increase in the parameters of oxidative stress of the tested insects, induces damage to the DNA at a level of approximately 35% and contributes to a disturbance in the stages of the cell cycle and causes an increase of apoptosis. Moreover, upon analysing histological specimens, we found numerous degenerative changes in the cells of the gut and testis of Acheta domesticus as early as ten days after applying GO.” [25]
Nanoparticles can cause DNA damage across a cellular barrier
G. Bhabra et al showed that “cobalt-chromium nanoparticles (29.5 +/- 6.3 nm in diameter) can damage human fibroblast cells across an intact cellular barrier without having to cross the barrier.” The outcome, which includes DNA damage without significant cell death, is different from that observed in cells subjected to direct exposure to nanoparticles.
“Our results suggest the importance of indirect effects when evaluating the safety of nanoparticles. The potential damage to tissues located behind cellular barriers needs to be considered when using nanoparticles for targeting diseased states.” [26]
Graphene face masks
Since a few years, graphene has been promoted and pushed into different application without an understanding of its health effects.
New Spearhead Projects were launched, eleven of them, which began their work in April 2020. One of the eleven is: GRAPHIL: Purifying water with graphene filtration for household purposes by 2023. [27]
“In 2020, it was announced that “A sieve from England causes a sensation: It uses a graphene oxide membrane to convert salt into drinking water. ”
If the developers are not extremely cautious that absolutely no graphene oxide is released into the water, then the consumers will need a lot of luck as well.
Projects are ongoing to use graphene in EV batteries. [28]
“It’s no surprise that what one country finds in face masks, will also be found by other countries – 85% of face masks used worldwide come from China. Perhaps the only surprise is why ALL countries are not examining face masks for toxic chemicals and banning their use, in ALL settings.” [29]
In September 2021, graphene oxide masks were restricted in Canada, only certified GO masks are allowed.
From the government of Canada: UPDATE (September 28, 2021): Additional graphene face mask authorized for sale
Canada continues to encourage Canadians to submit a complaint if they find graphene masks being sold in Canada other than the ones listed in the table below.
But FFP2 masks are used as the gold standard of Covid masks in Europe, they are widely used and mandatory in certain workplaces, even in nonmedical workplaces and schools in many European Countries. Often Employers make in mandatory to specifically wear FFP2 masks, according to EU norms, they all contain graphene.
One of the main manufacturers, HanterMed, described the mechanism of their FFP2 Graphene masks:
“The Graphene Mask utilizes the Nano- blade Effect of the Graphene Material to destroy viruses and bacteria. “

See also video in German: [30]
“All FFP2 masks sold in Germany and in most other countries contain graphene, designated by the norm SNN 70369b.”
-Graphene Masks petition
Toxic nano-graphene particles in Covid masks: NGOs call for more protection for consumers
In APRIL 2021, leading international health and environmental groups today published a letter to European leaderscalling for immediate action to ban the sale and use of face masks and other personal protective equipment containing nano-graphene and other nanoparticles. The call comes days after Canadian health officials released a public advisory and ban on single-use masks that contain nanographene – a material potentially toxic to lung health. [31]
Remedies for nanoparticle exposure
Glutathione and its precursor, NAC (N-Acetyl- cysteine) helps to replenish intracellular glutathione, a vital cellular antioxidant. Glutathione is one of the body’s most important antioxidants, which helps neutralize free radicals that can damage cells and tissues in your body.
Both Glutathione and NAC have been recommended by the Spanish group of physicians La Quinta Columna to treat acute side effects from the covid vaccination.
Also, “studies show N-Acetyl Cysteine supplement can possibly protect patients against COVID-19″.
“Today, NAC is on the World Health Organization’s list of valuable medicines.
NAC is a cheap vitamin-like medicine that is used as a prescription and over-the-counter drug.
It is actually a prodrug and precursor of the non-essential sulfur-containing amino acid in humans – Cysteine.
N-acetylcysteine is being discussed in over 10,000 scientific publications and over 300 human clinical trials in the past 10 years. ” [32]
Prevention and remedies of vaccine side effects
BioDesign, an institution who recommends the Covid Vaccine, also recommends taking NAC and Vitamin D to reduce side effects of the vaccine, to be administered before and after vaccination:
“In coordination with your healthcare professional and their guidance and recommendation, we feel taking 600 mg to 900 mg daily of a quality NAC supplement for at least four weeks after your second vaccination dose is administered (same for those choosing the one-dose Johnson & Johnson vaccine), should be considered.”
“We recommend four supplements to take in the days or weeks prior to receiving a COVID-19 vaccination. Be sure to use quality supplements from reputable manufacturers..” [33]
“There is some good news. Graphene can be flushed out of the body naturally. An enzyme found in our blood, myeloperoxidase, degrades graphene oxide. ” [34]
[1] Tara Copp; SENIOR PENTAGON REPORTER, DEFENSE ONE: US Army Creates Single Vaccine Against All COVID & SARS Variants, Researchers Say; Decemper 21, 2021
[2] science.org 21 DEC 2020 BYJOP DE VRIEZE https://www.science.org/content/article/suspicions-grow-nanoparticles-pfizer-s-covid-19-vaccine-trigger-rare-allergic-reactions
[3] Salonia, A., Pontillo, M.et al (2021), Severely low testosterone in males with COVID-19: A case-control study. Andrology, 9: 1043-1052. https://doi.org/10.1111/andr.12993
[4] Research looks at inflammatory nature of lipid nanoparticle component in mRNA vaccines
news-medical By Dr. Ramya Dwivedi, Ph.D. Mar 15 2021
[5] REUTERS FACT CHECK; NOVEMBER 18, 20217:00 PMUPDATED 2 MONTHS AGO
Fact Check-Most cases of myocarditis after COVID-19 vaccines are not irreversible.
https://www.reuters.com/article/factcheck-myocarditis-covid19-vaccine-idUSL1N2S924L
[6] news-medical, Mar 15 2021; Research looks at inflammatory nature of lipid nanoparticle component in mRNA vaccines; By Dr. Ramya Dwivedi, Ph.D.;
[7] James R. Gill, Randy Tashjian, Emily Duncanson; Autopsy Histopathologic Cardiac Findings in Two Adolescents Following the Second COVID-19 Vaccine Dose. Arch Pathol Lab Med 2022; doi: https://doi.org/10.5858/arpa.2021-0435-SA
[8] Tara Copp; SENIOR PENTAGON REPORTER, DEFENSE ONE: US Army Creates Single Vaccine Against All COVID & SARS Variants, Researchers Say
; Decemper 21, 2021
[9] THE EXPOSÉ, By Rhoda Wilson; The real pandemic – Covid-19 or Graphene Oxide? Poisonous Nano-Material found in Covid Vaccines and Face Masks ON JULY 10, 2021
[10] THE EXPOSÉ, By Rhoda Wilson; The real pandemic – Covid-19 or Graphene Oxide? Poisonous Nano-Material found in Covid Vaccines and Face Masks ON JULY 10, 2021
[11] THE EXPOSÉ, By Rhoda Wilson; The real pandemic – Covid-19 or Graphene Oxide? Poisonous Nano-Material found in Covid Vaccines and Face Masks ON JULY 10, 2021
[12] THE EXPOSÉ, By Rhoda Wilson; The real pandemic – Covid-19 or Graphene Oxide? Poisonous Nano-Material found in Covid Vaccines and Face Masks ON JULY 10, 2021
[13] Scanning & Transmission Electron Microscopy Reveals Graphene Oxide in CoV-19 Vaccines
Updated: Dec 16, 20212021, February 5th, Updated October 1st, 2021; Author: Robert O Young CPC, MSc, DSc, PhD, Naturopathic Practitioner; http://www.drrobertyoung.com; https://www.drrobertyoung.com/post/transmission-electron-microscopy-reveals-graphene-oxide-in-cov-19-vaccines
[14] Mikroskopierung im Studio: Smarte Splitter in Impfstoffen? – Holger Reißner; 18.12.2021; https://nuoflix.de/mikroskopierung-im-studio-smart-splitter-im-impfstoffen
[15] Cao W, He L, Cao W, Huang X, Jia K, Dai J. Recent progress of graphene oxide as a potential vaccine carrier and adjuvant. Acta Biomater. 2020 Aug;112:14-28. doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2020.06.009. Epub 2020 Jun 10. PMID: 32531395
[16] Ma, Baojin; Guo, Shi, et al. 2021: Reaction between Graphene Oxide and Intra- cellular Glutathione Affects Cell Viability and Proliferation. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces, Washington, D.C.: American Chemical Society, 2021, 10.1021/acsami.0c17523 . hal-03388508
[17] Ma, Baojin; Guo, Shi, et al 2021: Reaction between Graphene Oxide and Intra- cellular Glutathione Affects Cell Viability and Proliferation. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces, Washington, D.C.: American Chemical Society, 2021, 10.1021/acsami.0c17523 . hal-03388508
[18] Dziewięcka, Marta; Karpeta-Kaczmarek, Julia, et al 2017: Short-term in vivo exposure to graphene oxide can cause damage to the gut and testis, Journal of Hazardous Materials, Volume 328, 2017, Pages 80-89, ISSN 0304-3894, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2017.01.012.
(https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304389417300171)
[19] Graphene Oxide and Reduced Graphene Oxide Exhibit Cardiotoxicity Through the Regulation of Lipid Peroxidation, Oxidative Stress, and Mitochondrial Dysfunction
Jian Zhang et al 2021: Front. Cell Dev. Biol., 18 March 2021 | https://doi.org/10.3389/fcell.2021.616888
[20] the Human Brain Project;
https://graphene-flagship.eu/graphene/understand/ Graphene Flagship; https://graphene-flagship.eu
[21] Iavicoli, I., Fontana, L., Leso, V., & Bergamaschi, A. (2013). The effects of nanomaterials as endocrine disruptors. International journal of molecular sciences, 14(8), 16732–16801. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms140816732
[22] A method for non-surgical sterilization of mammals using an antibody-guided nanoparticle carrying cytotoxin to kill gonadal cells exhibiting anti-Mullerian hormone II receptors.” Published: 29/4/2020; Sandra Ayres; Qiaobing Xu; Non-surgical, species agnostic animal sterilization.
Applications Animal Sterilization; PCT Publication No. WO 2018-022292 (February 1, 2018) https://viceprovost.tufts.edu/method-non-surgical-sterilization-mammals-using-antibody-guided-nanoparticle-carrying-cytotoxin
[23] Wang R, Song B, Wu J, Zhang Y, Chen A, Shao LQ. 2018: Potential adverse effects of nanoparticles on the reproductive system. Int J Nanomedicine. 2018;13:8487-8506
https://doi.org/10.2147/IJN.S170723; https://www.dovepress.com/potential-adverse-effects-of-nanoparticles-on-the-reproductive-system-peer-reviewed-fulltext-article-IJN
[24] Graphene-based nanomaterials: biological and medical applications and toxicity
Fernanda MP Tonelli, Vânia AM Goulart, Katia N Gomes, Marina S Ladeira, Anderson K Santos, Eudes Lorençon, Luiz O Ladeira, and Rodrigo R Resende; Nanomedicine 2015 10:15, 2423-2450
[25] Dziewięcka, Marta, et al 2017: Short-term in vivo exposure to graphene oxide can cause damage to the gut and testis, Journal of Hazardous Materials, Volume 328, 2017, Pages 80-89, ISSN 0304-3894, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2017.01.012.
(https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304389417300171)
[26] Bhabra G, Sood A, Fisher B, Cartwright L, Saunders M, Evans WH, Surprenant A, Lopez-Castejon G, Mann S, Davis SA, Hails LA, Ingham E, Verkade P, Lane J, Heesom K, Newson R, Case CP. Nanoparticles can cause DNA damage across a cellular barrier. Nat Nanotechnol. 2009 Dec;4(12):876-83. doi: 10.1038/nnano.2009.313. PMID: 19893513.
[27] THE EXPOSÉ, By Rhoda Wilson; The real pandemic – Covid-19 or Graphene Oxide? Poisonous Nano-Material found in Covid Vaccines and Face Masks ON JULY 10, 2021
[28] Graphene-based batteries which can charge in 15 seconds and supplement lithium-ion batteries
Recharging driverless mobility – Marsh Mc Lennan http://www.mmc.com
[29] THE EXPOSÉ, By Rhoda Wilson; The real pandemic – Covid-19 or Graphene Oxide? Poisonous Nano-Material found in Covid Vaccines and Face Masks ON JULY 10, 2021
[30] FFP2-Graphen-Masken-mit-Nano-Klingen-Effekt-nach-EN149; FFP2 masken werben mit graphene nanopartikeln; December 29th, 2021; https://odysee.com/@Ich-bin-der-Mungo-DWD:f/FFP2-Graphen-Masken-mit-Nano-Klingen-Effekt-nach-EN149:c
[31] IN SAICM BLOG, NEWS, INTERNATIONAL, EUROPA, CHEMIKALIEN & GESUNDHEIT, NESTBAU, RE-BOOTING FRAUENRECHTE; BY WECF; 8. APRIL 2021
[32] A-Z GUIDE TO N-ACETYL CYSTEINE (NAC) BENEFITS; Nootropic Blend staff; https://nootropicblend.com/the-alphabet-of-nac-benefits/
[33] Reduce the Side Effects of a Vaccination by Boosting Your Immune System; By Dr. Matt Lewis / July 1, 2021 /
[34] The real pandemic – Covid-19 or Graphene Oxide? Poisonous Nano-Material found in Covid Vaccines and Face Masks
BY THE EXPOSÉ ON JULY 10, 2021
Categories: Allgemein
Microtubules (description at the end of this post) : I had forgotten a long-past Artificial Neural Network interest of mine: for decades there has been conjecture about the potential role of cell microtubules in cell computations beyond “straightforward” physiology (which isn’t straightforward at all!. ALL cells are powerful processors of massive amounts of information, NOT just neurons!!
Gerald Pollack, Uof Washington, evolved concepts for the structure of water to describe a gel-like 4th phase of water (“EZ water”), and discussed in detail how phase transitions between bulk and gel water could explain or elaborate many basic processes, and some energy carrier needs, of ALL cells (not just neurons).
1) the cell’s very directed “microtubule highly-specific transport network” could be orders of magnitude [faster, more efficient] compared to simple diffusion in bulk water (if I remember correctly, for the assembly of complex protein, precise sequential progression through catalytic pathways, and other junk?)
2) it was shown decades ago that ion pumps are NOT required to maintain short-term (hours?) ion concentration discontinuities across membranes (although they may help. are they essential longer term?). Pollock showed how this could be explained by the gel-like phase of water.
3) the neuron cell membrane potential’s role in spiking has always been a core concept for (not discussed by Pollack that I remember, but very obviously arises from his work). So have been neuro-transmitters (eg [dopamine, serotonin, acetocholine, nor-adrenaline], etc, etc).
4) Pollack’s books provide an awesome potential mechanism for the origins of life : a cheap, renewable, reliable electrochemical enersource. That idea could complement Stuart Kauffman’s “At the Edge of Chaos” book description of auto-catalytic networks bsed on high-diversity chemical localities (eg surfactant-enclosed). Sun-exposed sea shorline or lagoons etc mt be great potential areas.
Graphene oxide is described in the article above as a singlater sheet. But it is very common to get rolled-up [single, double, …] sheets of graphene (graphite actually?), so does this happen with graphene oxide (perhaps to a lesser extent, much larger diameter?)? Nanotubules are tubes of hexagonal sheets of carbon (graphite) that have very special [physical, electrical] properties. They are kind of the tubular cousins of the famous “BuckeyBalls” (one example : C60 is like a soccer ball’s hexagon-pentagon mix)
Comparing lgth scales, should graphene oxide be expected to have neuro-physiological importance? If not bio-chemically due to electrical properties (as hypothesized decades ago for potential bio effects of nano-particles), then as “sand clogging up a machine”? :
(nano-meters (nm))
microtubule 24 diameter
nanotubule ~3 diameter
C60 buckeyball ~1 diameter
synapse ~10,000 width across face (~diameter)
synaptic gap ~20-40 across cleft
[Na, K] ion channels are probably atomic scale (~Angstrom?)
https://byjus.com/biology/microtubules/ : “Microtubules are microscopic, hollow tubes made of alpha and beta tubulin that are a part of the cell’s cytoskeleton.” Microtubules extend throughout the cell providing it with proper shape and keeping the organelles in place. They are the largest structures in the cytoskeleton and are about 24 nm thick. They facilitate cell movement, cell division, and transportation of materials within the cells. They are also involved in the division of chromosomes during the process of mitosis and in locomotion.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Wow, This is going to take some time to sink in, and to compare with Dobler’s book Hormonaggedon. Dobler’s [astronomical, electro-magnetic, historical, hormonal, human behaviour] context is rich and interesting. As my priority “hobby science” area since 1988 is Artificial Neural Networks, and my current project is about building “platform concepts” for [DNA, RNA]-based Spiking Neural Networks, the neurological impacts and [electrical, electronic] nature of graphene oxide is of casual interest. But I am decades away from being able to consider it or even neuro-transmitters. (i.e., only some time after my death can I hope to work on it).
LikeLiked by 1 person