How chemical- hormonal Disruption determines Elections

Published by

Sacha Dobler

13. July 2022

How chemical- hormonal Disruption determines Elections

Gonad hormones (sex hormones) literally determine political elections. In the 2012 presidential election season (Obama/ Biden’s reelection against Mitt Romney) weakly affiliated Democrats had 19% higher basal testosterone than those who identified strongly with the party. When weakly affiliated Democrats received additional testosterone, the strength of their party fell by 12% (p=.01) and they reported 45% warmer feelings towards Republican candidates for president. “Testosterone induces a “red shift” among weakly-affiliated Democrats,” summarized the paper.^{^[i]}

Leaving out the artificial testosterone treatment: If a 19% lower basal testosterone level can make a strongly affiliated Democrat as opposed to a weakly affiliated Democrat, then what would this mean for testosterone levels of men 50 years ago, when they were twice as high as today?

By the trajectory the democratic party has shifted to the left in recent years, it is easy to extrapolate, that if people as a whole would not have their gonad hormones artificially compromised, i.e. if man had the testosterone of their grandfathers (twice their current levels,; and if women had the oestrogen levels of their grandmothers)), then no one would vote for the current democrat platform. Biden could have received but a few percentages of the votes. Again, people and peoples don’t just “evolve” without an interference to biology or natural selection and times don’t just “change”.

^[i] Zak, Paul. Testosterone Administration Induces A Red Shift in Democrats. Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor], 2021-11-24. https://doi.org/10.3886/E155441V1 https://www.openicpsr.org/openicpsr/project/155441/version/V1/view

5 responses to “How chemical- hormonal Disruption determines Elections”

Anonymous

26. August 2022

to Jan: I have no data available on hormonal differences in the vaccinated. But the nanoparticles contained in the vaccines do accumulate in gonads (male and female). https://abruptearthchanges.com/2022/02/18/the-nanoparticle-pandemic-covid-how-the-global-bio-tech-and-insurance-industry-predicted-a-nanotech-disaster/
and the behavioural symptoms of vaccinated people are concurrent with further disruption of gonad hormones. Even before the vacs. men with low Testosterone and women with low oestrogen were much more affected by the new disease.

LikeLike
Jan

25. July 2022

Any ideas that vaccinated people have different levels of hormones? Any differences between the USA and other countries?

LikeLike
Anonymous

21. July 2022

“if man had the testosterone of their grandfathers (twice their current levels), then no one would vote for the current democrat platform.”
This includes:
if women had the Estrogen levels of their grandmothers, then no one would vote for the current democrat platform.

LikeLike
Anonymous

21. July 2022

“if man had the testosterone of their grandfathers (twice their current levels), then no one would vote for the current democrat platform.”

I think women have been voting in US presidential elections since 1920. What a peculiar bit of text.

LikeLike
www-BillHowell-ca

13. July 2022

I assume that the researchers were careful enough to address the rising dominance of the female vote? But I as that is also quite variable?

LikeLike